1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 458 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge Omni. (115 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Omni | Countryman |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 47 L |