1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 996 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2013 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Omni | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1991 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5009 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 74 L |