1982 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1386 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Omni | Tundra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5329 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1925 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3221 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 100 L |