1982 Fiat 127 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1982 Fiat 127 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Fiat 127. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 110 kg more than 1982 Fiat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat 127. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat 127 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | 127 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2210 mm |
