1982 Fiat 127 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat 127 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1982 Fiat 127. (49 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 1099 kg more than 1982 Fiat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat 127. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat 127. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1982 Fiat 127 has manual transmission. 1982 Fiat 127 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat 127 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Fiat | Dodge |
| Model | 127 | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 365 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 536 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 67.2 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1929 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3052 mm |
