1982 Fiat 131 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat 131 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 1982 Fiat 131. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 666 kg more than 1982 Fiat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat 131. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat 131 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 131 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1365 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 529 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2620 mm |