1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 1965 Ford Corsair
To start off, 1982 Fiat Argenta is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 1,663 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Ford Corsair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1965 Ford Corsair. (76 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 135 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 1965 Ford Corsair | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Argenta | Corsair |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 45 L |