1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 1984 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1984 Nissan Cedric is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Nissan Cedric (102 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Nissan Cedric (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1984 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 1984 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Argenta | Cedric |
Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2740 mm |