1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 1996 Toyota Picnic
To start off, 1996 Toyota Picnic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Picnic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Picnic (127 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Picnic should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Picnic (181 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Picnic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Argenta | 1996 Toyota Picnic | |
| Make | Fiat | Toyota |
| Model | Argenta | Picnic |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 70 L |
