1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (522 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Argenta | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 105.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 75 L |