1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 2,444 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace. (89 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace (226 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Argenta | 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
| Make | Fiat | Toyota |
| Model | Argenta | Hi-Ace |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2444 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1960 mm |
