1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2002 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2002 Ford Econovan is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econovan.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Econovan (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Argenta | 2002 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Argenta | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1789 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2210 mm |
