1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Argenta | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 16.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 60 L |