1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Fiat Argenta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Fiat Argenta (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1982 Fiat Argenta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Argenta | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 17.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 55 L |