1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Clio (152 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Argenta | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 55 L |