1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Argenta | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Fiat | Holden |
| Model | Argenta | Epica |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2700 mm |
