1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan NP300 (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan NP300 (205 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Argenta | NP300 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 75 L |