1982 Fiat Argenta vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (380 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Argenta. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Argenta | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Argenta | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 61 L |