1982 Fiat Panda vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Panda would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Panda | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Panda | Econovan |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 1789 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2210 mm |