1982 Fiat Panda vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Panda would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Panda. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Panda.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Panda. (66 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Panda | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | Fiat | SsangYong |
Model | Panda | Stavic |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 3197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 66 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 80 L |