1982 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II
To start off, 1982 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II weights approximately 1268 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Ritmo | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II | |
| Make | Fiat | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ritmo | Silver Cloud II |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 6223 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2108 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3130 mm |
