1982 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1996 Skoda Felicia
To start off, 1996 Skoda Felicia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Skoda Felicia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Skoda Felicia (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Skoda Felicia should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Skoda Felicia weights approximately 135 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Skoda Felicia (100 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Skoda Felicia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Ritmo | 1996 Skoda Felicia | |
Make | Fiat | Skoda |
Model | Ritmo | Felicia |
Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 86 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2460 mm |