1982 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2001 Opel Omega

To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 795 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (290 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Fiat Ritmo 2001 Opel Omega
Make Fiat Opel
Model Ritmo Omega
Year Released 1982 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1116 cc 3175 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 53 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 86 Nm 290 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 88 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 840 kg 1635 kg
Vehicle Length 4020 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2740 mm