1982 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Ritmo | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |