1982 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 882 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Ritmo | STS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 368 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1802 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |