1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 1966 Saab 96
To start off, 1982 Fiat Vivace is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Saab 96. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Saab 96 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Saab 96 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Vivace (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1966 Saab 96. (63 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace should accelerate faster than 1966 Saab 96. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Saab 96 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Saab 96 (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Saab 96 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Vivace | 1966 Saab 96 | |
Make | Fiat | Saab |
Model | Vivace | 96 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 58.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2510 mm |