1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1982 Fiat Vivace is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 130 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Vivace | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Vivace | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2210 mm |