1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1982 Fiat Vivace is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 271 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Vivace | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Vivace | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1372 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 101.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2750 mm |
