1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 1984 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1984 Jaguar XJR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1984 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 96 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Because 1984 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Vivace | 1984 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Fiat | Jaguar |
Model | Vivace | XJR |
Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2870 mm |