1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 600 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Vivace | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Vivace | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3030 mm |
