1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 1997 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1997 Ford Mustang is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Mustang weights approximately 126 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Because 1997 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Mustang (678 Nm) has 576 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Vivace | 1997 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Vivace | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1372 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 678 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 936 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2580 mm |
