1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW

To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 1095 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Vivace. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 1982 Fiat Vivace has manual transmission. 1982 Fiat Vivace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: