1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 2001 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2001 Nissan Cima is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Cima weights approximately 960 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Because 2001 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Vivace | 2001 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Vivace | Cima |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |