1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Fiat Vivace weights approximately 70 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 102 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Fiat Vivace 2004 MCC Crossblade
Make Fiat MCC
Model Vivace Crossblade
Year Released 1982 2004
Engine Size 1372 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 70 HP
Torque 102 Nm 102 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3210 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 810 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 3750 mm 2630 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2230 mm 1810 mm