1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1464 kg more than 1982 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Vivace | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Vivace | Armada |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1372 cc | 5555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 3140 mm |
