1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 64 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Kangoo (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Fiat Vivace | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Vivace | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2610 mm |