1982 Fiat Vivace vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Fiat Vivace (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Fiat Vivace should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Fiat Vivace (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Fiat Vivace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Fiat Vivace | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | Vivace | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2480 mm |
