1982 Ford Cortina vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1982 Ford Cortina. (60 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Celica weights approximately 104 kg more than 1982 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Celica (170 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Cortina. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Cortina | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Cortina | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 92 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |