1982 Ford Cortina vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1982 Ford Cortina. (60 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Cortina.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Cortina. (92 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Cortina | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Ford | Citroen |
| Model | Cortina | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 92 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
