1982 Ford Cougar vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1982 Ford Cougar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Cougar weights approximately 720 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1982 Ford Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Cougar | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Cougar | Fronte |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2250 mm |