1982 Ford Cougar vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner

To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Cougar weights approximately 262 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner.

Because 1982 Ford Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Cougar has automatic transmission and 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner has manual transmission. 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Cougar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Cougar 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Cougar Space Runner
Year Released 1982 1995
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4186 cc 1834 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 120 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1218 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2530 mm