1982 Ford Cougar vs. 1999 MCC Smart
To start off, 1999 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Cougar weights approximately 780 kg more than 1999 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Cougar | 1999 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Cougar | Smart |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2280 mm |