1982 Ford Cougar vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,816 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 465 kg more than 1982 Ford Cougar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Cougar has automatic transmission and 2003 GMC Sierra has manual transmission. 2003 GMC Sierra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Cougar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Cougar | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Cougar | Sierra |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 4816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3380 mm |