1982 Ford Cougar vs. 2004 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Subaru Outback is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Subaru Outback weights approximately 10 kg more than 1982 Ford Cougar.
Because 2004 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Cougar has automatic transmission and 2004 Subaru Outback has manual transmission. 2004 Subaru Outback will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Cougar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Cougar | 2004 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Cougar | Outback |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |