1982 Ford Escort vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Escort. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Escort would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Ford Escort. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Escort.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Escort. (137 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Escort.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Escort | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Escort | Megane |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 236 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |