1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 1944 Simca 5
To start off, 1982 Ford Fairlane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Simca 5 would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Fairlane (125 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1944 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1944 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 836 kg more than 1944 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Fairlane | 1944 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Fairlane | 5 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1944 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 564 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2010 mm |
