1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 1975 Mazda 616
To start off, 1982 Ford Fairlane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Fairlane (125 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 490 kg more than 1975 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Fairlane (296 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Fairlane | 1975 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Fairlane | 616 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |