1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 436 kg more than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1836 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2730 mm |
