1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 1997 Acura CL is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura CL (145 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Acura CL weights approximately 180 kg more than 1982 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Fairlane | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Fairlane | CL |
Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2715 mm |