1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2006 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Fairlane | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2490 mm |